Skip to main content

Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story - review

 



While I found the pacing of Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story slow and, at times, even boring, the show shines in one particular area: its psychological depth. 

What kept me engaged wasn’t the storytelling rhythm, but the way it explored two very distinct and haunting personalities under the same roof.

Two Sides of the Same Violence

The series captures the sharp contrast between Lyle and Erik brilliantly. On one side, we see the volatile, angry, and violent brother—unpredictable but outwardly dominant, always ready to explode. On the other side, there is the insecure, fragile “mouse” of the family—timid, hesitant, almost paralyzed by fear. 

Yet, what makes Erik compelling is that under the right conditions, even he can lash out violently, especially when pulled into the orbit of his more aggressive brother. The dynamic between them feels like a nightmare recipe: one commanding, the other submissive, but both carrying destructive potential.

The Many Shapes of Abuse

This portrayal becomes even more powerful when considered against the backdrop of their relationship with their father. The show doesn’t shy away from showing how abuse shapes identity. What’s fascinating here is the divergence—how two sons exposed to the same trauma internalize it so differently. 

For Lyle, the abuse seems to feed rage, rebellion, and the urge to fight back at any cost. For Erik, it grows into fear, insecurity, and a desperate need for protection—even if that protection comes from the very brother who drags him into violence.

The High Point of The Show

This psychological complexity is where the show truly succeeds. It underlines how abuse doesn’t create a single “type” of victim. Instead, it fractures personalities in unique ways, setting the stage for both domination and submission, both rage and paralyzing fear. 

By the end, you don’t just see two killers—you see two boys whose identities were twisted and reshaped, each scar manifesting differently.

Better to Learn Than to Have Fun

While the show may not work perfectly as entertainment, it deserves credit as a psychological study.

The way it depicts the interplay of personality, trauma, and family dynamics makes it an unsettling but valuable portrait of how monsters are not simply born, but painfully created.

If you are into criminal psychology and how personalities develop in violent offenders, take a look at Mindhunter.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Zero Day (Netflix): When Power, Fear, and Truth Collide

  What happens when society’s most terrifying vulnerability—our digital infrastructure—suddenly collapses?  Netflix ’s political thriller Zero Day dares to explore exactly that. Starring Robert De Niro as former U.S. President George Mullen, alongside Angela Bassett , Lizzy Caplan , Jesse Plemons , and Dan Stevens , this six-part miniseries blends conspiracy, paranoia, and deeply human drama into a story that feels both timely and unsettling. A Premise That Feels Too Possible The series kicks off with a catastrophic cyberattack that leaves the nation in chaos. It’s not just thrilling entertainment—it’s frighteningly plausible. Watching events spiral out of control, you can’t help but ask yourself: could this actually happen? Twists That Keep You Guessing From backroom deals to sudden betrayals, Zero Day is packed with sharp turns. You might think you know where it’s going, but the finale delivers a conclusion that’s both surprising and thought-provoking. Jesse Plemo...

Gen V Season 2: From Cameos to Confidence

I wasn’t a huge fan of Gen V ’s first season . For me, it lived more on cameos and ties to The Boys than on its own merits. It often felt like an extended piece of world-building rather than a show that could stand on its own. Season 2, though, feels different. For the first time, Gen V is carving out its own identity. The storylines are more engaging, the stakes feel higher, and it’s not just hanging on the shadow of Homelander or Vought headlines.  The Highs and Lows of Performance That said, not everything works. The acting is uneven—some scenes land with the intended emotional weight, but others feel awkward enough that I wondered how they made it past editing.  On top of that, the show piles on so much interpersonal drama and mystery that it occasionally slips into Scooby-Doo territory: a gang of young heroes pulling at conspiratorial threads, but without enough grounding to keep every subplot compelling. A Thoughtful Tribute One aspect the show handles beautifull...