Skip to main content

The Walking Dead



The Walking Dead


I waited a long time to talk about this show because I felt that it wasn’t easy to summarize all of my thoughts on it in a couple of paragraphs. However, today is the day, though I might end up writing about it again in the future since I’m one season behind. Plenty of things might change.

Faithful to the Source


I started watching this show with my husband, who is a fan of the comics on which it was based. The first season was interesting enough to get me to start watching the second one. 

Six episodes weren’t enough to make me know precisely what I thought of it, but it was more of a general feeling of “Oh, I quite enjoyed this, let’s watch a bit more”.

The years passed, and we had season after season. Somewhere along the way, my husband stopped watching it, but I just couldn’t. I always wanted one more episode, one more season. It was so much more than just the mere Humanity vs. Zombies. Actually, over time, zombies become some sort of weird backyard decor. 

The show is about people, about humanity itself


The dead rising and starting to eat the living was a very good excuse for humans to reveal their true colors —the darker side of themselves. This show can often tell us a great deal about ourselves and the human race in general.

The consecutive seasons offer some perspective. You follow Rick’s (you can also watch Andrew Lincoln in an episode of Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities) group since the beginning, so they’re obviously the good guys. But as soon as you start observing the other groups they come across, it’s impossible not to question yourself about a few things. Are they actually that different?

There are no innocents.


I remember one season when they took some prisoners from another group who had attacked them. And the arguing between characters made us think, “Wait, who actually started all of this after all?” That pretty much sums up how the world works.

Rick’s group is, after all, as bad as most others, and the other people they meet are just as good as they are (most of them at least). We just tend to be biased and have a greater affinity with Rick and his group of survivors, so we’ll understand their point of view more than others, usually ending up rooting for them, regardless of whether they’re actually doing the right thing. 

You're With Them


We´re talking about a more profound sense of belonging, and the outsiders are mere enemies, obstacles, and threats to their survival, even though we just don’t really know them. 

This is the end of the world after all. Who can really risk doing ‘the right thing’ anymore? Does that even matter anymore?

If you start watching the show expecting just another shallow zombie show, you’ll probably have quite a few surprises in store.


If you like zombie apocalypse themes in all sorts of ways, consider checking out Rezort and Quarantine 2: Terminal

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gen V Season 2: From Cameos to Confidence

I wasn’t a huge fan of Gen V ’s first season . For me, it lived more on cameos and ties to The Boys than on its own merits. It often felt like an extended piece of world-building rather than a show that could stand on its own. Season 2, though, feels different. For the first time, Gen V is carving out its own identity. The storylines are more engaging, the stakes feel higher, and it’s not just hanging on the shadow of Homelander or Vought headlines.  The Highs and Lows of Performance That said, not everything works. The acting is uneven—some scenes land with the intended emotional weight, but others feel awkward enough that I wondered how they made it past editing.  On top of that, the show piles on so much interpersonal drama and mystery that it occasionally slips into Scooby-Doo territory: a gang of young heroes pulling at conspiratorial threads, but without enough grounding to keep every subplot compelling. A Thoughtful Tribute One aspect the show handles beautifull...

Zero Day (Netflix): When Power, Fear, and Truth Collide

  What happens when society’s most terrifying vulnerability—our digital infrastructure—suddenly collapses?  Netflix ’s political thriller Zero Day dares to explore exactly that. Starring Robert De Niro as former U.S. President George Mullen, alongside Angela Bassett , Lizzy Caplan , Jesse Plemons , and Dan Stevens , this six-part miniseries blends conspiracy, paranoia, and deeply human drama into a story that feels both timely and unsettling. A Premise That Feels Too Possible The series kicks off with a catastrophic cyberattack that leaves the nation in chaos. It’s not just thrilling entertainment—it’s frighteningly plausible. Watching events spiral out of control, you can’t help but ask yourself: could this actually happen? Twists That Keep You Guessing From backroom deals to sudden betrayals, Zero Day is packed with sharp turns. You might think you know where it’s going, but the finale delivers a conclusion that’s both surprising and thought-provoking. Jesse Plemo...

The Handmaid’s Tale – From Brilliant to Frustrating

  When The Handmaid’s Tale first aired, it felt sharp, terrifying, and painfully necessary. I wrote about the first season as a dark and brilliant adaptation, one that used restraint, symbolism, and dread to tell its story. Now that I've finished the third season, my opinion has shifted — not wholly, but noticeably. The show is still good . Sometimes very good. But it also became frustrating, uneven, and less powerful than it could have been. June Osborne: From Survivor to Exhaustion Let’s talk about June (Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men ). I understand the idea behind her arc. She was meant to evolve — to become more confident, more assertive, more dangerous. A woman shaped by trauma who stops surviving and starts fighting back. On paper, it makes sense. On screen, however, it often doesn’t work. June becomes reckless to the point of irresponsibility. She repeatedly puts others in danger without seeming to fully care about who might be caught in the crossfire. Her actions feel impuls...