Skip to main content

Review: Freud - From the weird to absurd in 8 episodes




Freud is a bizarre Austrian-German show about the beginning of Sigmund Freud's career. It puts a young Sigmund Freud in the middle of the social-political conspiracy. Were you expecting a biography? Sorry to disappoint you.

The main idea is, no doubt, weird. I'm not exactly sure about what I saw there. Only in the last couple of episodes, you can make some sense of a few things. FEW.

Entrance


I could not ignore the entrance of the show as it is one of the best things about it. It is very curious. If you pay attention, Freud's bust changes at each episode. Each change represents the different topics or issues approached — the integration and disintegration of the self, so crucial in Freud's theory.  

Mysticism


Everything seems fine until the story begins. It is not about psychology - not as we understand it - but rather about mysticism. It is focused on local folklore, mystical stories, and supernatural beings. 

The main plot is around the Hungarian couple's plans. The Countess wants revenge. We understand that. Her means are the problem. Were all those people hypnotized? 

It is difficult to ignore the lack of realism when the show claims to be talking about a real person. Yet, if you can ignore that, you may make some sense of what you're watching. All those people are tools in their hands. For what? We only know in the last episode, and while it is mysterious for some time, it becomes annoying.

It wasn't all terrible, though. The highest point of the show happens in episode 7 - a trip to the unconscious. It is the closed you get to Freud's concept. A real one. The analogy of the dark house with a few (small) points with light is one of my favorites.  

Hypnosis


Hypnosis is the central topic of the show, but you probably won't see that right away. It's all about its power.

I found no reference to the main story of the Hungarians, so I must believe it was made up for the show. That makes sense if you focus on some details. How can Fleur be hypnotized so easily? And all the others? What does the Countess do to them? Why don't they wake up? Why is her hypnosis so constant? Scientifically, it doesn't make any sense!

Philosophically though, the show raises a question. How far can the manipulation of the unconscious take you? How dangerous would it be?

Trauma


Trauma seems to be the center of all the patients' problems. 

I found the Inspector Kiss a quite interesting character. He has PTSD and a problem with his hand. The hand he used to kill enemy soldiers. Unarmed men. Surrendered men. He obeyed an order with which he didn't agree, and his hand represents his regrets.

Then, you have Clara. She seems to have been tortured and can't speak. What exactly happened to her?  Her mom takes her out of the hospital (which makes her the most intelligent character at the point) and then… Nothing. We would like to know what happened next. Would she recover? Would she talk?

Artistic design Vs. Credibility


Freud starts weird and then becomes absurd. Many parts had no sense at all. Are they supposed to represent some sort of hallucinations due to his abuse of cocaine? Taltos was a metaphor for the monsters hiding in our unconscious mind? We are never sure.

And the end? What's that supposed to mean? Does Taltos live in the Inspector? Is he still hypnotized? Does he really have a monster inside him? It's all quite ambiguous. Very artistic, but with doubtful interest. 

The Power of hypnosis


The show ends up with Freud burning the book he wrote. A book that, as far as I know, never existed, or perhaps it did, and it was forbidden, like in the show. 

"Your time will come, one way, or another." Kiss says to him, and he is right. Freud leaves the hospital and starts working on what he truly believes. 

Freud is a curious show. Not necessarily interesting. Especially if you are looking for something else, such as a bio, the name might give you that idea. It's the wrong idea.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes

This is not the sort of show which I usually talk about on this blog. However, as a psychologist, I’m usually quite curious in regards to criminals and their minds; and one of these days I started watching this documentary on Netflix . Taking into consideration the kind of thing this is, I can’t say I ‘liked’ it. I mean what you see in there is nothing to like, but I was rather terrified, which is probably the usual response. Nonetheless, it was definitely a good documentary. The eyes of a killer Everything displayed in this story was terrible. The descriptions, Bundy’s posture, everything seemed like some sort of horror show, putting into perspective what we may consider to be lucky or unlucky in this life. Before I even start watching it, I read somewhere that this was the kind of thing you shouldn’t watch alone. Sounds accurate right now. At the time, and considering my, mostly academic, experience, I didn’t think that this could actually be so upsetting.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Mist (2017) - quick review

  A thick mist falls up a town, and something about it isn’t right - good premise. We would expect nothing less than good from a Stephen King’s book. Yet, as we all know, book adaptations can be quite disappointing.  It goes from good to terrible. I loved the plot and, in the beginning, I was very curious and interested - it was almost impossible to stop watching it. Yet, at some point, it started to get on my nerves, and not in the way that a good horror show should. As we got closer to the end of the season, many things stopped making sense. Some characters are simply… not believable. The explanations for whatever was happening were ridiculous and easily refutable. It all took away the feeling of “this could be real”. It killed my interest. Many changes were made to the original novel. Some of them were interesting and made the story better, yet others were… well, nonsense. Cast and production As I said before, the first episodes were good and made us want to keep watching, but I was
Post a Comment
Read more

Show Review: Emily in Paris

  It took me a long time to give Emily in Paris a shot because I thought it would be a silly, shallow comedy about some sort of influencer. Well, it is a silly, shallow comedy about some sort of influencer, but to be honest, I liked it.  Emily is a young talent in a marketing career and has the opportunity of her life: working in Paris for a year! And since her boyfriend is an idiot, she can try the full experience of being a single woman in the city of love.  Unfortunately, she is not as good at managing her personal life as she is at work. In fact, she is frankly terrible at making decisions outside work. Cultural Differences Everyone who has been in a foreign country knows that sometimes we get ourselves into awkward situations due to cultural differences. So watching someone else go through the same is quite funny. I must admit that seeing an American trying to speak French is hilarious. Of course, I’m not French (and French people who hear me trying to speak French could have a s
Post a Comment
Read more