Skip to main content

Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind - Review

 

Sapiens

I picked up this book at someone else’s library, and I started reading it because I was bored. After a couple of pages, I couldn’t stop. Sapiens is a fantastic reflection of humanity and its place in this world.

It is an accessible history class, written in a compelling novel fashion. You can either agree with Harari or find it a little reductionist (thousands of years in a few pages can have that impact); you won’t be able to ignore it. 

Are WE that special?

For many years, we thought that we were special, near-divine. According to Harari, we are just another animal that happened to control the world for several reasons. It seems that a series of random events led us to this point.

One of the most curious things I found in this book was that I thought man’s evolution was a sort of continuum line where one single species evolved, step by step. Apparently, like with any other animal, there were different "kinds" of humans sharing the world. At some point, all the others were gone, except for sapiens. Why?

There are a few theories, but the one that looks more accurate thorough scientific evidence is that the first sapiens committed the first genocide in history. It is terrifying when you think our ancestors may have killed all other human species on earth. Besides that, it is impossible not to think: what would happen if there were still different species of humans nowadays?

How would our world be? Better? Worse? Would we think about ourselves and our so-called “uniqueness” differently? Would we be in constant war? Would the sapiens unify the world under his domination anyway? The hypotheses are endless!

We are a plague

You don’t need to go very far to listen to people talking about how we destroy the planet. The news may be that we always did that! The Sapiens destroy ecosystems for thousands of years!

When we look back, there is a lot we can’t know about primitive humans. Were they pacifists or constantly at war? Did they have a political system? Did they measure time in some way? We can try to guess, but there is no empirical evidence. Yet, one thing seems certain: we'd destroy the environment around us, anywhere we’d go. 

Whole ecosystems seem to have been eradicated. The author gives an example about the Australian megafauna, completely wiped out from earth after the first sapiens get to the continent. One example, amongst many others. “Humankind is a mass murderer, ecologically speaking.”, says Harari. We are the biggest dissimulation of nature. We look fragile and harmless, yet we are the most deadly being on this earth. Apparently, we always have been.

Agricultural Revolution: the beginning of decay

With the development of agriculture, humans no longer need to run from one place to another. Sounds good, right? Well, Harari calls it the biggest fraud of history. According to him, we started to live more, not better. 

We have more food, but fewer options and more nutrition problems. Our health went worst. The villages are colonies for bacteria and viruses. We started to have spine problems, arthritis, and hernias. Child mortality increased. The notion of property made us more selfish and aggressive.

Randomness: Are we a result of the butterfly effect?

The author seems to have a negative vision of evolution. Yet humanity isn't to blame for it all. According to him, most prejudices came from random happenings. They create myths, and generalization does the rest.

He focused on racism, genre equality, or homosexuality, all explored biologically, ignoring the so-called cultural rules and prejudices. Culture is changeable by happenings or discoveries that make you question everything you knew. 

He makes us think about how small coincidences can change everything in a moment - even the course of history. 

The unification of mankind - money

Harari sees most of our evolution through our beliefs, and there is only one thing that all humans believe in - money.

Money is the true unifier of humanity because everyone believes in it. All countries use it. Its value is unquestionable. Money united us in a way that religions, kings, and empires never could.

The truth is: I don’t know

With the ending of absolute truths given by religious beliefs, humanity looked for concrete, exact data - we developed math, altering how we see the world.

Admitting that we didn’t know it all was the first big step to our history's biggest revolution.

Industrial Revolution - the power of energy and time

One of the things I liked the most about this book is how it can put in perspective what seemed obvious to us. Industrial Revolution is explored in History Classes, but you don’t always understand how fast it happened. 

For millions of years, humans used the strength of their muscles. Suddenly, someone invents the steam engine, and in a blink of an eye, humanity is dependent on oil and electricity. 

Huge factories work around the world, and time is no longer measured according to the sunlight. Now, we have watches and alarms, precise schedules. We work when it’s time to work, not when the sun rises. We eat when it’s time to eat, not when we are hungry.

Trust in future

The more you evolve, the faster are the changes. We trust that. 

Money is no longer something you can touch. Most of the money you use every day doesn’t even exist. What supports the modern economy is trust—our trust in the institutions. 

The idea of growth and improvement is fairly recent, but this idea allowed credits and investors. The idea of progress taught us to trust in the future. 

I’m god

Sapiens offers an interesting and accurate perspective of humanity. Most humans feel they are special beings and everything else on this planet is here to serve them. That’s why this is an important reading for all of us. 

My favorite part of this book is the initial one, maybe because it was the one that surprised me the most. 

Harari finishes with one question: are we happier now? The evolution of science, the changes we make in this world, and the fantastic genetic discoveries are as fascinating as scary. Are we making it better, or are we destroying our world for good? 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes

This is not the sort of show which I usually talk about on this blog. However, as a psychologist, I’m usually quite curious in regards to criminals and their minds; and one of these days I started watching this documentary on Netflix . Taking into consideration the kind of thing this is, I can’t say I ‘liked’ it. I mean what you see in there is nothing to like, but I was rather terrified, which is probably the usual response. Nonetheless, it was definitely a good documentary. The eyes of a killer Everything displayed in this story was terrible. The descriptions, Bundy’s posture, everything seemed like some sort of horror show, putting into perspective what we may consider to be lucky or unlucky in this life. Before I even start watching it, I read somewhere that this was the kind of thing you shouldn’t watch alone. Sounds accurate right now. At the time, and considering my, mostly academic, experience, I didn’t think that this could actually be so upsetting.

The Mist (2017) - quick review

  A thick mist falls up a town, and something about it isn’t right - good premise. We would expect nothing less than good from a Stephen King’s book. Yet, as we all know, book adaptations can be quite disappointing.  It goes from good to terrible. I loved the plot and, in the beginning, I was very curious and interested - it was almost impossible to stop watching it. Yet, at some point, it started to get on my nerves, and not in the way that a good horror show should. As we got closer to the end of the season, many things stopped making sense. Some characters are simply… not believable. The explanations for whatever was happening were ridiculous and easily refutable. It all took away the feeling of “this could be real”. It killed my interest. Many changes were made to the original novel. Some of them were interesting and made the story better, yet others were… well, nonsense. Cast and production As I said before, the first episodes were good and made us want to keep watching, but I was

Show Review: Emily in Paris

  It took me a long time to give Emily in Paris a shot because I thought it would be a silly, shallow comedy about some sort of influencer. Well, it is a silly, shallow comedy about some sort of influencer, but to be honest, I liked it.  Emily is a young talent in a marketing career and has the opportunity of her life: working in Paris for a year! And since her boyfriend is an idiot, she can try the full experience of being a single woman in the city of love.  Unfortunately, she is not as good at managing her personal life as she is at work. In fact, she is frankly terrible at making decisions outside work. Cultural Differences Everyone who has been in a foreign country knows that sometimes we get ourselves into awkward situations due to cultural differences. So watching someone else go through the same is quite funny. I must admit that seeing an American trying to speak French is hilarious. Of course, I’m not French (and French people who hear me trying to speak French could have a s