Skip to main content

Last Thoughts on Gen V – Season 2

 

Gen V - Season 2 - Finalle

There was a lot to say about Gen V Season 2. It started strong — the show was finally finding its own voice, its own space, and its own story separate from The Boys. But the last episode let me down. Everything that made Gen V feel fresh and independent was rushed or undone, as if the only goal was to merge it back into The Boys' story for Season 5.

It’s frustrating because Gen V no longer felt like a cameo show… until it suddenly became one again.

The Godolkin Arc: Wasted Potential

The Godolkin University storyline was one of the most interesting parts of the series. 

The politics, the power struggles, the moral ambiguity — it all had so much potential. But instead of giving it the depth it deserved, the finale rushed to wrap everything up, as if the writers were desperate to move on from these characters. It could have been so much more.

Character Highlights and Misses

Marie Moreau – Supposed to be the heart and hero of the show, but she never really captured my attention. She lacks charisma and depth, and her new “resurrecting powers” feel more ridiculous than impressive. For a main character, she’s surprisingly forgettable.

Jordan – One of the season’s biggest missed opportunities. The concept of a gender-shifting hero had so much potential to explore identity, power, and perception — but Jordan ends up being strangely flat. There’s no spark, no defining trait that makes them memorable. For a show that was trying to be bold, Jordan feels oddly bland and underwritten.

Little Cricket – The real MVP. She brings humor, warmth, and humanity to the story. Every scene with her feels alive — exactly what the show needed.

Cate – A great example of character growth done right. She evolves, struggles, and changes in believable ways. Easily one of the highlights of the season.

Sam – A big disappointment. He was set up as this incredibly powerful and complex figure, but this season gives him little purpose. His arc feels incomplete.

Marie’s Sister – Simply annoying. Her presence didn’t add much and mostly distracted from stronger storylines.

Sage – Surprisingly better here than in The Boys. She wasn’t that compelling before, but in Gen V she actually developed and gained her own space. Her character finally had something to say.

Cameos and Missed Opportunities

Stan Edgar’s brief appearance was one of the season’s high points. His presence always elevates a scene — but his storyline, like so many others, was wrapped up far too easily. The little girl subplot had potential, too, but it ended up feeling rushed.

Then there’s the ending — unnecessary cameos from The Boys that broke the momentum Gen V had built. Starlight’s appearance felt forced, and the last scene served only to merge both shows again. It was disappointing to see Gen V give up its own identity so fast.

The Odessa Project and Homelander Connection

The Odessa Project was fascinating — a peek into the dark science behind Vought and even hints at Homelander’s origins. 

There was a great moral question here: why did Marie turn out compassionate while Homelander became a monster? Both were products of experimentation, but one was raised as a person, the other as an asset. 

That’s a powerful theme, yet the show barely touches it. Such a missed opportunity.

The Promise That Faded Too Soon

Gen V Season 2 was better than expected — until it wasn’t. It started to stand on its own, with strong arcs and intriguing characters, but collapsed under the pressure to reconnect with The Boys. Everything felt rushed in the end. The show had earned its own voice but gave it up too quickly.

What could have been a bold, character-driven story became just another setup for the main series. And that’s a shame, because Gen V deserved more than to be just a bridge.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can Monsters Love?Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story

  Netflix's Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story is not just a true crime documentary — it’s a psychological deep dive into one of the most disturbing couples in British criminal history .  While the crimes are shocking, the nature of Fred and Rose’s relationship truly unsettles. Were they in love? Or was their bond something far darker? A Match Made in Hell From the moment Fred and Rose met, something clicked. But it wasn’t a love story — it was a dangerous connection built on control, abuse, and mutual cruelty.  The documentary shows us how they fed off each other’s darkest urges. It wasn’t about love in the traditional sense. It was about power, domination, and shared depravity. Can Psychopaths Feel Love? This is the big question. Can two people with such extreme psychological disorders really feel love? Some experts believe psychopaths can feel attachment, but not empathy — they might need someone, but not care for them in the way most of us understand....

Raising Voices - Why Alma's Mom Had the Right Reaction

  In Netflix’s Raising Voices , there's a raw, emotionally charged moment when Alma confesses to her mom that something happened the night she disappeared — she was drunk, she had sex, and something didn’t feel right. It’s the kind of moment that many parents dread. But Alma’s mom handled it in a way that deserves attention. She didn’t panic. She didn’t judge. She didn’t lose control. Instead, she met her daughter halfway, which made all the difference. What Happened in the Scene? When Alma opened up to her mom, she wasn’t just confessing — she was testing the waters for safety. Could she trust her mom with the truth? Would she still be loved after saying something shameful, scary, or confusing? Her mom’s response wasn’t perfect — but it was real. She was concerned, but didn’t explode. She asked questions. She listened. She let the moment breathe. Why That Reaction Matters Technically, what Alma described can be considered sexual assault , given her level of intoxication. Bu...

Adolescence: A Mirror We Can’t Look Away From

  How Can a 13-Year-Old Commit Murder? What was once an absurd, unthinkable question is the central premise of Adolescence , Netflix ’s latest British drama.  From the first episode, the show grips you with its raw portrayal of youth violence. It pushes us to confront an unsettling reality—children, barely teenagers, are capable of unimaginable acts. But Adolescence does not sensationalize crime; rather, it dissects it , laying bare the complex web of factors that lead to such a moment. It’s Not About the Victim Unlike many crime dramas, Adolescence does not dwell on the victim. Instead, it forces us to ask: Who is the perpetrator? Who is his family? Who are his friends? What kind of environment produces a child capable of killing?  The show wrestles with these haunting questions, exposing the uncomfortable truth that the killer does not come from an easily identifiable “dangerous” background. His family is normal—too normal. This leads us to the most disturbing though...