Skip to main content

Last Thoughts on Gen V – Season 2

 

Gen V - Season 2 - Finalle

There was a lot to say about Gen V Season 2. It started strong — the show was finally finding its own voice, its own space, and its own story separate from The Boys. But the last episode let me down. Everything that made Gen V feel fresh and independent was rushed or undone, as if the only goal was to merge it back into The Boys' story for Season 5.

It’s frustrating because Gen V no longer felt like a cameo show… until it suddenly became one again.

The Godolkin Arc: Wasted Potential

The Godolkin University storyline was one of the most interesting parts of the series. 

The politics, the power struggles, the moral ambiguity — it all had so much potential. But instead of giving it the depth it deserved, the finale rushed to wrap everything up, as if the writers were desperate to move on from these characters. It could have been so much more.

Character Highlights and Misses

Marie Moreau – Supposed to be the heart and hero of the show, but she never really captured my attention. She lacks charisma and depth, and her new “resurrecting powers” feel more ridiculous than impressive. For a main character, she’s surprisingly forgettable.

Jordan – One of the season’s biggest missed opportunities. The concept of a gender-shifting hero had so much potential to explore identity, power, and perception — but Jordan ends up being strangely flat. There’s no spark, no defining trait that makes them memorable. For a show that was trying to be bold, Jordan feels oddly bland and underwritten.

Little Cricket – The real MVP. She brings humor, warmth, and humanity to the story. Every scene with her feels alive — exactly what the show needed.

Cate – A great example of character growth done right. She evolves, struggles, and changes in believable ways. Easily one of the highlights of the season.

Sam – A big disappointment. He was set up as this incredibly powerful and complex figure, but this season gives him little purpose. His arc feels incomplete.

Marie’s Sister – Simply annoying. Her presence didn’t add much and mostly distracted from stronger storylines.

Sage – Surprisingly better here than in The Boys. She wasn’t that compelling before, but in Gen V she actually developed and gained her own space. Her character finally had something to say.

Cameos and Missed Opportunities

Stan Edgar’s brief appearance was one of the season’s high points. His presence always elevates a scene — but his storyline, like so many others, was wrapped up far too easily. The little girl subplot had potential, too, but it ended up feeling rushed.

Then there’s the ending — unnecessary cameos from The Boys that broke the momentum Gen V had built. Starlight’s appearance felt forced, and the last scene served only to merge both shows again. It was disappointing to see Gen V give up its own identity so fast.

The Odessa Project and Homelander Connection

The Odessa Project was fascinating — a peek into the dark science behind Vought and even hints at Homelander’s origins. 

There was a great moral question here: why did Marie turn out compassionate while Homelander became a monster? Both were products of experimentation, but one was raised as a person, the other as an asset. 

That’s a powerful theme, yet the show barely touches it. Such a missed opportunity.

The Promise That Faded Too Soon

Gen V Season 2 was better than expected — until it wasn’t. It started to stand on its own, with strong arcs and intriguing characters, but collapsed under the pressure to reconnect with The Boys. Everything felt rushed in the end. The show had earned its own voice but gave it up too quickly.

What could have been a bold, character-driven story became just another setup for the main series. And that’s a shame, because Gen V deserved more than to be just a bridge.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Handmaid’s Tale – From Brilliant to Frustrating

  When The Handmaid’s Tale first aired, it felt sharp, terrifying, and painfully necessary. I wrote about the first season as a dark and brilliant adaptation, one that used restraint, symbolism, and dread to tell its story. Now that I've finished the third season, my opinion has shifted — not wholly, but noticeably. The show is still good . Sometimes very good. But it also became frustrating, uneven, and less powerful than it could have been. June Osborne: From Survivor to Exhaustion Let’s talk about June (Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men ). I understand the idea behind her arc. She was meant to evolve — to become more confident, more assertive, more dangerous. A woman shaped by trauma who stops surviving and starts fighting back. On paper, it makes sense. On screen, however, it often doesn’t work. June becomes reckless to the point of irresponsibility. She repeatedly puts others in danger without seeming to fully care about who might be caught in the crossfire. Her actions feel impuls...
Post a Comment
Read more

Grief in the Shadows: Why 'The Silencing' Stands Out

  A moody thriller about grief, violence, and how far we go for the ones we love. Nikolaj Coster-Waldau ( Game of Thrones ) is Rayburn Swanson , a former hunter who now lives in isolation, running a wildlife sanctuary named after his missing daughter. Years after she vanished, Rayburn is just barely functioning—haunted, grieving, and clinging to the hope that she might still return. When a murdered girl turns up in the woods with eerie similarities to his daughter's disappearance, the local sheriff, Alice Gustafson ( Annabelle Wallis ), launches an investigation. Rayburn, meanwhile, accidentally crosses paths with a mysterious masked figure hunting a girl on his land. This encounter pulls him into the heart of the case in ways he never expected. The investigation twists, misleads, and slowly unravels, building toward a reveal that isn’t obvious—and intentionally so. Nothing is as straightforward as it seems. Themes of Grief and Family What makes The Silencing compelling is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gangsta Granny – Hilarious and Surprisingly Moving

  I have a ten-year-old daughter, and one thing we like to do is read the same books so we can talk about them afterward. Gangsta Granny was a birthday gift for her, and she read it so quickly that it immediately made me curious. When a child finishes a book that fast, you know something is working. When I finally read it myself, I was pleasantly surprised — and completely charmed. A Story That Is Funny and Moving At first glance, Gangsta Granny is a crazy, over-the-top, and very funny story. David Walliams clearly knows how to make children laugh, using absurd situations, exaggerated characters, and a fast-moving plot that keeps young readers hooked. But beneath the humour, the book is also sweet, touching, and emotionally rich. What starts as a wild adventure slowly reveals a story about family, loneliness, empathy, and learning to truly see the people around us. This balance reminded me of Roald Dahl’s books , where outrageous humour and emotional depth coexist effortles...
Post a Comment
Read more