Skip to main content

The Last Fix - Review



In The Last Fix, Dahl creates a psychological thriller full of secrets and half-told stories. The plot is complex, and even though it takes too long to really get into the story, it is engaging.


Don't trust the First Paragraphs


Although this was a good book, it didn't satisfy me. Why? Well, first of all, when I started the book, I felt it would be full of all sorts of cliches, and although they're dismissed at the end, it kept me wary during the rest of the reading.

It is good, but it has weaknesses 


Like any good crime novel, there are many twists, but they can sometimes be tiring. Although we may be surprised by who the real killer is, I felt the end was a little cold and lacked emotion. 

Along the way, it was almost impossible to determine who the murderer was, and in the end, that person's motive was the weakest part of the plot from my point of view.

In one part of the story, we have information concerning another point of view (the killers'), but it's so cloudy that it doesn't help the narrative.

Frolich and Gunnarstranda are an excellent duo that keeps us interested, but maybe because of the great expectations created by the reviews I had previously read, they were sort of a letdown.

Strong Atmosphere, Weak Resolution


Despite its flaws, The Last Fix remains an intriguing read for fans of Nordic noir. Dahl’s writing is atmospheric, and his ability to weave a web of deception keeps the reader engaged. 

While the twists sometimes feel exhausting and the resolution lacks emotional depth, the journey itself is compelling. 

If you enjoy slow-burning psychological thrillers with complex characters, this book is worth a try—just be prepared for a few frustrations along the way.

If you like Scandinavian crime thrillers, consider looking at Stieg Larsson's work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gen V Season 2: From Cameos to Confidence

I wasn’t a huge fan of Gen V ’s first season . For me, it lived more on cameos and ties to The Boys than on its own merits. It often felt like an extended piece of world-building rather than a show that could stand on its own. Season 2, though, feels different. For the first time, Gen V is carving out its own identity. The storylines are more engaging, the stakes feel higher, and it’s not just hanging on the shadow of Homelander or Vought headlines.  The Highs and Lows of Performance That said, not everything works. The acting is uneven—some scenes land with the intended emotional weight, but others feel awkward enough that I wondered how they made it past editing.  On top of that, the show piles on so much interpersonal drama and mystery that it occasionally slips into Scooby-Doo territory: a gang of young heroes pulling at conspiratorial threads, but without enough grounding to keep every subplot compelling. A Thoughtful Tribute One aspect the show handles beautifull...

Zero Day (Netflix): When Power, Fear, and Truth Collide

  What happens when society’s most terrifying vulnerability—our digital infrastructure—suddenly collapses?  Netflix ’s political thriller Zero Day dares to explore exactly that. Starring Robert De Niro as former U.S. President George Mullen, alongside Angela Bassett , Lizzy Caplan , Jesse Plemons , and Dan Stevens , this six-part miniseries blends conspiracy, paranoia, and deeply human drama into a story that feels both timely and unsettling. A Premise That Feels Too Possible The series kicks off with a catastrophic cyberattack that leaves the nation in chaos. It’s not just thrilling entertainment—it’s frighteningly plausible. Watching events spiral out of control, you can’t help but ask yourself: could this actually happen? Twists That Keep You Guessing From backroom deals to sudden betrayals, Zero Day is packed with sharp turns. You might think you know where it’s going, but the finale delivers a conclusion that’s both surprising and thought-provoking. Jesse Plemo...

The Handmaid’s Tale – From Brilliant to Frustrating

  When The Handmaid’s Tale first aired, it felt sharp, terrifying, and painfully necessary. I wrote about the first season as a dark and brilliant adaptation, one that used restraint, symbolism, and dread to tell its story. Now that I've finished the third season, my opinion has shifted — not wholly, but noticeably. The show is still good . Sometimes very good. But it also became frustrating, uneven, and less powerful than it could have been. June Osborne: From Survivor to Exhaustion Let’s talk about June (Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men ). I understand the idea behind her arc. She was meant to evolve — to become more confident, more assertive, more dangerous. A woman shaped by trauma who stops surviving and starts fighting back. On paper, it makes sense. On screen, however, it often doesn’t work. June becomes reckless to the point of irresponsibility. She repeatedly puts others in danger without seeming to fully care about who might be caught in the crossfire. Her actions feel impuls...