Skip to main content

13 reasons why: Season 3 - Let’s talk about difficult topics




After getting disappointed at Season 2, I believed this was one of those shows that had should not continue beyond its first season. Nonetheless, I give it a try once more, to find a storyline full of questionable choices.

(contain spoilers)

Ani, the new girl


With the new school year, a new student comes to Liberty High: Ani. Ani comes from a different country, doesn’t know anyone, and suddenly, she is the new narrator of the story. It seemed interesting in the beginning. We would have the perspective of an outsider about what was happening. The problem is that Ani does not behave exactly as an outsider. 

She is a strong young woman, independent, confident, who knows how to move around, mingling amongst her new colleagues. The problem is, the new girl, that no one really knows is, suddenly, ‘besties’ with everyone. How reasonable is that? Have the authors ever been “the new girl”?

Something that could be interesting to see explored was her cultural background. However, it was only superficially addressed; through the lies, she seems to feel obligated to tell her mom. 

Bryce’s Murder


We start this season with a missing person's case: Bryce Walker disappeared. We quickly find out he was murdered. This case is the main story of the season, and let me tell you - it was unnecessary. 

The audience hates him. No one cares! Besides that, once again, this show tells us that plenty of times, you can commit a crime, of any kind, and have zero consequences for it. Is this the message we want to pass to our teenagers? We will be back to this topic later. For now, let’s look at the positive side of this new focus in the story.

No matter what I think about Bryce’s redemption attempt, this deeper perspective of the character was a good addition to the show. The idea that bad people are not evil all the time, that they also have family, friends, and feelings themselves, is, as controversial as it may be, an essential notion that most of us tend to forget.  

Message of Empowerment


Jessica is no longer the sad, fragile girl we met in season 2. She is now a strong character, trying to lead other teenage girls sexually abused to step forward. Unfortunately, not always in the best way possible, but that is part of being a teenager anyway. Some scenes irritated me, though. 

I liked, however, her speech in the gym scene, when all the victims stand up and say, “I am a survivor.” It was a powerful scene, clearly inspired by the #metoo movement.

Approaching to difficult topics


This was, in my opinion, from the very beginning the best part of the show. We must talk about what’s ugly, scary or uncomfortable, instead of pretending it’s not there. 

The show talks about all the “uglies” present in our society: suicide, sexual assault, abuses, gun violence, abortion, etc. Not always with the best approach, I must admit, but it’s probably a good way to start talking about these things.

One of the things that surprised me the most was seeing mentioned male sexual abuse or rape. It was painfully difficult to watch Tyler’s scene in season 2 and I thought of it as senseless violence with no other purpose than shocking. I changed my mind this season. I still hate the scene, I don’t want to watch it again but brings to light a very delicate topic that is for some reason a bigger tabu than sexual assault in general.

Moral dilemma


The end of the story is as annoying as disgusting. We found out who killed Bryce. However, nothing happens. “Let the dead bury the dead,” says Ani to the Sheriff, as who is sweeping the trash under the carpet. Am I the only one thinking about corruption here? Would the Sheriff accept the suggestion if Alex was someone else’s son? 

I have a simple question: what were the values they were trying to pass here?

“He was a human being!”, screams Winston at Ani, referring to Monty, at the end of the show. Should we forget this?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can Monsters Love?Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story

  Netflix's Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story is not just a true crime documentary — it’s a psychological deep dive into one of the most disturbing couples in British criminal history .  While the crimes are shocking, the nature of Fred and Rose’s relationship truly unsettles. Were they in love? Or was their bond something far darker? A Match Made in Hell From the moment Fred and Rose met, something clicked. But it wasn’t a love story — it was a dangerous connection built on control, abuse, and mutual cruelty.  The documentary shows us how they fed off each other’s darkest urges. It wasn’t about love in the traditional sense. It was about power, domination, and shared depravity. Can Psychopaths Feel Love? This is the big question. Can two people with such extreme psychological disorders really feel love? Some experts believe psychopaths can feel attachment, but not empathy — they might need someone, but not care for them in the way most of us understand....

Raising Voices - Why Alma's Mom Had the Right Reaction

  In Netflix’s Raising Voices , there's a raw, emotionally charged moment when Alma confesses to her mom that something happened the night she disappeared — she was drunk, she had sex, and something didn’t feel right. It’s the kind of moment that many parents dread. But Alma’s mom handled it in a way that deserves attention. She didn’t panic. She didn’t judge. She didn’t lose control. Instead, she met her daughter halfway, which made all the difference. What Happened in the Scene? When Alma opened up to her mom, she wasn’t just confessing — she was testing the waters for safety. Could she trust her mom with the truth? Would she still be loved after saying something shameful, scary, or confusing? Her mom’s response wasn’t perfect — but it was real. She was concerned, but didn’t explode. She asked questions. She listened. She let the moment breathe. Why That Reaction Matters Technically, what Alma described can be considered sexual assault , given her level of intoxication. Bu...

Adolescence: A Mirror We Can’t Look Away From

  How Can a 13-Year-Old Commit Murder? What was once an absurd, unthinkable question is the central premise of Adolescence , Netflix ’s latest British drama.  From the first episode, the show grips you with its raw portrayal of youth violence. It pushes us to confront an unsettling reality—children, barely teenagers, are capable of unimaginable acts. But Adolescence does not sensationalize crime; rather, it dissects it , laying bare the complex web of factors that lead to such a moment. It’s Not About the Victim Unlike many crime dramas, Adolescence does not dwell on the victim. Instead, it forces us to ask: Who is the perpetrator? Who is his family? Who are his friends? What kind of environment produces a child capable of killing?  The show wrestles with these haunting questions, exposing the uncomfortable truth that the killer does not come from an easily identifiable “dangerous” background. His family is normal—too normal. This leads us to the most disturbing though...