Skip to main content

13 reasons why: Season 3 - Let’s talk about difficult topics




After getting disappointed at Season 2, I believed this was one of those shows that had should not continue beyond its first season. Nonetheless, I give it a try once more, to find a storyline full of questionable choices.

(contain spoilers)

Ani, the new girl


With the new school year, a new student comes to Liberty High: Ani. Ani comes from a different country, doesn’t know anyone, and suddenly, she is the new narrator of the story. It seemed interesting in the beginning. We would have the perspective of an outsider about what was happening. The problem is that Ani does not behave exactly as an outsider. 

She is a strong young woman, independent, confident, who knows how to move around, mingling amongst her new colleagues. The problem is, the new girl, that no one really knows is, suddenly, ‘besties’ with everyone. How reasonable is that? Have the authors ever been “the new girl”?

Something that could be interesting to see explored was her cultural background. However, it was only superficially addressed; through the lies, she seems to feel obligated to tell her mom. 

Bryce’s Murder


We start this season with a missing person's case: Bryce Walker disappeared. We quickly find out he was murdered. This case is the main story of the season, and let me tell you - it was unnecessary. 

The audience hates him. No one cares! Besides that, once again, this show tells us that plenty of times, you can commit a crime, of any kind, and have zero consequences for it. Is this the message we want to pass to our teenagers? We will be back to this topic later. For now, let’s look at the positive side of this new focus in the story.

No matter what I think about Bryce’s redemption attempt, this deeper perspective of the character was a good addition to the show. The idea that bad people are not evil all the time, that they also have family, friends, and feelings themselves, is, as controversial as it may be, an essential notion that most of us tend to forget.  

Message of Empowerment


Jessica is no longer the sad, fragile girl we met in season 2. She is now a strong character, trying to lead other teenage girls sexually abused to step forward. Unfortunately, not always in the best way possible, but that is part of being a teenager anyway. Some scenes irritated me, though. 

I liked, however, her speech in the gym scene, when all the victims stand up and say, “I am a survivor.” It was a powerful scene, clearly inspired by the #metoo movement.

Approaching to difficult topics


This was, in my opinion, from the very beginning the best part of the show. We must talk about what’s ugly, scary or uncomfortable, instead of pretending it’s not there. 

The show talks about all the “uglies” present in our society: suicide, sexual assault, abuses, gun violence, abortion, etc. Not always with the best approach, I must admit, but it’s probably a good way to start talking about these things.

One of the things that surprised me the most was seeing mentioned male sexual abuse or rape. It was painfully difficult to watch Tyler’s scene in season 2 and I thought of it as senseless violence with no other purpose than shocking. I changed my mind this season. I still hate the scene, I don’t want to watch it again but brings to light a very delicate topic that is for some reason a bigger tabu than sexual assault in general.

Moral dilemma


The end of the story is as annoying as disgusting. We found out who killed Bryce. However, nothing happens. “Let the dead bury the dead,” says Ani to the Sheriff, as who is sweeping the trash under the carpet. Am I the only one thinking about corruption here? Would the Sheriff accept the suggestion if Alex was someone else’s son? 

I have a simple question: what were the values they were trying to pass here?

“He was a human being!”, screams Winston at Ani, referring to Monty, at the end of the show. Should we forget this?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes

This is not the sort of show which I usually talk about on this blog. However, as a psychologist, I’m usually quite curious in regards to criminals and their minds; and one of these days I started watching this documentary on Netflix . Taking into consideration the kind of thing this is, I can’t say I ‘liked’ it. I mean what you see in there is nothing to like, but I was rather terrified, which is probably the usual response. Nonetheless, it was definitely a good documentary. The eyes of a killer Everything displayed in this story was terrible. The descriptions, Bundy’s posture, everything seemed like some sort of horror show, putting into perspective what we may consider to be lucky or unlucky in this life. Before I even start watching it, I read somewhere that this was the kind of thing you shouldn’t watch alone. Sounds accurate right now. At the time, and considering my, mostly academic, experience, I didn’t think that this could actually be so upsetting.

The Mist (2017) - quick review

  A thick mist falls up a town, and something about it isn’t right - good premise. We would expect nothing less than good from a Stephen King’s book. Yet, as we all know, book adaptations can be quite disappointing.  It goes from good to terrible. I loved the plot and, in the beginning, I was very curious and interested - it was almost impossible to stop watching it. Yet, at some point, it started to get on my nerves, and not in the way that a good horror show should. As we got closer to the end of the season, many things stopped making sense. Some characters are simply… not believable. The explanations for whatever was happening were ridiculous and easily refutable. It all took away the feeling of “this could be real”. It killed my interest. Many changes were made to the original novel. Some of them were interesting and made the story better, yet others were… well, nonsense. Cast and production As I said before, the first episodes were good and made us want to keep watching, but I was

Show Review: Emily in Paris

  It took me a long time to give Emily in Paris a shot because I thought it would be a silly, shallow comedy about some sort of influencer. Well, it is a silly, shallow comedy about some sort of influencer, but to be honest, I liked it.  Emily is a young talent in a marketing career and has the opportunity of her life: working in Paris for a year! And since her boyfriend is an idiot, she can try the full experience of being a single woman in the city of love.  Unfortunately, she is not as good at managing her personal life as she is at work. In fact, she is frankly terrible at making decisions outside work. Cultural Differences Everyone who has been in a foreign country knows that sometimes we get ourselves into awkward situations due to cultural differences. So watching someone else go through the same is quite funny. I must admit that seeing an American trying to speak French is hilarious. Of course, I’m not French (and French people who hear me trying to speak French could have a s