Skip to main content

The Boys in the Band - Review: 2 hours that feel like 2 minutes

 


Have you ever sit with your friends for a night of laughter and a good talk? Have you ever been to a party that… didn’t go that well? That is what happens in The Boys in the Band, and it is surprisingly perfect.

More than anything, have fun

The movie has many funny moments that make you laugh, while others may make you cringe a bit. In both cases, you’ll have a good time watching it.

99% of the movie is a birthday party that didn’t go that well… At some point, things get kind of heavy, and discomfort invades the room. Well, who never?

The most curious for me was that I would never think that this would work. Who would think that a bunch of guys arguing in a room for 2 hours would make such a good movie? I wouldn’t think I would want to watch something like that, not even half of it. Yet, when the movie was over, I asked, “Already?” It seemed like 20 minutes had passed instead of 2 hours, and that is the biggest compliment you can make to a piece of entertainment.

Good text, good pace, good actors

The way it was shot worked perfectly. It can be because most of the movie happens in the same room, or because of some camera perspective I know nothing about, you feel like you’re there. You are at that party. You feel like dancing, and you feel uncomfortable at times. You may even feel like sharing. Perhaps, you’ll want to stop Michael from hurting the others when it is pretty clear that his biggest issues are with himself. A tremendous protagonist, a fantastic character, interpreted by an amazing actor.

The text is excellent, exceptionally well written; you never lose interest. It has a good pace, and the fantastic cast makes it shine even more. Talking about the cast, this is what inclusion means. Well done!

60s Context

A group of gay friends celebrates the birthday of one of them inside a house - in the 1960s. What seems so natural now was illegal at the time. They couldn’t be there; they couldn’t socialize. They couldn’t exist. 

The rising tension wonderfully created by the author brings up many things. The fears, despair, sometimes confusion that those men needed to bear… in silence. In a time where everything was illegal for them, they can’t be ignored anymore.

That was the goal of the original play, the base of this movie. The play was a true revolution and a significant risk for all involved in the production. Again, it is an excellent piece of writing.

Beyond the Movie

My advice for you is to watch the movie. After that, you also need to watch the small documentary (also available on Netflix) to better understand the original context of the play. It is around half an hour of fascinating information contextualizing what you watched. It has historical information, interviews with the author, and the actors of the movie.

Overall, The Boys in the Band is a great movie you must watch. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes

This is not the sort of show which I usually talk about on this blog. However, as a psychologist, I’m usually quite curious in regards to criminals and their minds; and one of these days I started watching this documentary on Netflix . Taking into consideration the kind of thing this is, I can’t say I ‘liked’ it. I mean what you see in there is nothing to like, but I was rather terrified, which is probably the usual response. Nonetheless, it was definitely a good documentary. The eyes of a killer Everything displayed in this story was terrible. The descriptions, Bundy’s posture, everything seemed like some sort of horror show, putting into perspective what we may consider to be lucky or unlucky in this life. Before I even start watching it, I read somewhere that this was the kind of thing you shouldn’t watch alone. Sounds accurate right now. At the time, and considering my, mostly academic, experience, I didn’t think that this could actually be so upsetting.

The Mist (2017) - quick review

  A thick mist falls up a town, and something about it isn’t right - good premise. We would expect nothing less than good from a Stephen King’s book. Yet, as we all know, book adaptations can be quite disappointing.  It goes from good to terrible. I loved the plot and, in the beginning, I was very curious and interested - it was almost impossible to stop watching it. Yet, at some point, it started to get on my nerves, and not in the way that a good horror show should. As we got closer to the end of the season, many things stopped making sense. Some characters are simply… not believable. The explanations for whatever was happening were ridiculous and easily refutable. It all took away the feeling of “this could be real”. It killed my interest. Many changes were made to the original novel. Some of them were interesting and made the story better, yet others were… well, nonsense. Cast and production As I said before, the first episodes were good and made us want to keep watching, but I was

Show Review: Emily in Paris

  It took me a long time to give Emily in Paris a shot because I thought it would be a silly, shallow comedy about some sort of influencer. Well, it is a silly, shallow comedy about some sort of influencer, but to be honest, I liked it.  Emily is a young talent in a marketing career and has the opportunity of her life: working in Paris for a year! And since her boyfriend is an idiot, she can try the full experience of being a single woman in the city of love.  Unfortunately, she is not as good at managing her personal life as she is at work. In fact, she is frankly terrible at making decisions outside work. Cultural Differences Everyone who has been in a foreign country knows that sometimes we get ourselves into awkward situations due to cultural differences. So watching someone else go through the same is quite funny. I must admit that seeing an American trying to speak French is hilarious. Of course, I’m not French (and French people who hear me trying to speak French could have a s