Skip to main content

Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story — A Review

 

Evil Influencer

Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story is, unfortunately, a very good documentary about something deeply disturbing. I found it far more effective than the episodic documentaries Netflix has been making lately. 

It doesn’t rely on false suspense, ominous music, or artificial cliffhangers to create an “atmosphere.” That restraint matters. When the subject is this horrific, manufacturing tension feels almost disrespectful. The story is already twisted and sickening enough.

The documentary lays out the facts clearly and lets the reality speak for itself. What emerges is not just a scandal or a crime story, but a deeply unsettling portrait of power, control, and moral collapse.

Manipulation as a Weapon

One of the most frightening aspects of this case is the manipulation. Jodi Hildebrandt deliberately targeted vulnerable people and exploited them. When you understand someone’s context—emotional wounds, fears, beliefs—it becomes disturbingly easy to manipulate them. Jodi knew exactly how to do that.

Her background as a psychologist makes this even scarier. She understood the language of therapy, authority, and self-improvement. She knew how to operate in that territory, how to justify her actions, and how to prepare herself in case things “went down.” Watching this unfold is chilling because it shows how expertise can be weaponized.

When Manipulation Is No Longer Enough

But manipulation alone does not explain everything.

You might convince someone that separating from a spouse for a few months could be “helpful” or “necessary.” That happens, even if it’s harmful. But torturing your children? That goes far beyond manipulation.

At some point, responsibility cannot be outsourced to influence alone. Ruby Franke was not an innocent person corrupted from nothing. She already harbored cruelty. She already wanted to do horrible things—but she was restrained, at least partially, by morality. Society’s morality, not necessarily her own.

Jodi didn’t create Ruby’s darkness. She validated it. She gave it a framework, a justification, and permission. And once that happened, everything escalated terrifyingly fast. The children paid the price. There are no “lessons” there—only grief and disgust.

The Problem with “Coaching”

This documentary also raises serious concerns about the rise of coaching culture. Please, go to licensed therapists. Not “coaches” with a certificate earned in a few months, sometimes entirely online.

Even when coaches are well-intentioned, they often lack the education, ethical framework, and supervision necessary to handle complex psychological situations. And even licensed therapists—no matter how academically accomplished—are still human and fallible.

If something feels wrong, leave. Get a second opinion. Don’t follow anyone blindly. Authority should never replace critical thinking.

That may be a lesson adults can take from this story. For the children involved, there is no lesson—only injustice.

A Disturbing Familiarity

This documentary reminded me of Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story. Different crimes, different contexts—but the same haunting realization: you never really know what is happening behind closed doors.

And that may be the most unsettling truth of all.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can Monsters Love?Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story

  Netflix's Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story is not just a true crime documentary — it’s a psychological deep dive into one of the most disturbing couples in British criminal history .  While the crimes are shocking, the nature of Fred and Rose’s relationship truly unsettles. Were they in love? Or was their bond something far darker? A Match Made in Hell From the moment Fred and Rose met, something clicked. But it wasn’t a love story — it was a dangerous connection built on control, abuse, and mutual cruelty.  The documentary shows us how they fed off each other’s darkest urges. It wasn’t about love in the traditional sense. It was about power, domination, and shared depravity. Can Psychopaths Feel Love? This is the big question. Can two people with such extreme psychological disorders really feel love? Some experts believe psychopaths can feel attachment, but not empathy — they might need someone, but not care for them in the way most of us understand....

Raising Voices - Why Alma's Mom Had the Right Reaction

  In Netflix’s Raising Voices , there's a raw, emotionally charged moment when Alma confesses to her mom that something happened the night she disappeared — she was drunk, she had sex, and something didn’t feel right. It’s the kind of moment that many parents dread. But Alma’s mom handled it in a way that deserves attention. She didn’t panic. She didn’t judge. She didn’t lose control. Instead, she met her daughter halfway, which made all the difference. What Happened in the Scene? When Alma opened up to her mom, she wasn’t just confessing — she was testing the waters for safety. Could she trust her mom with the truth? Would she still be loved after saying something shameful, scary, or confusing? Her mom’s response wasn’t perfect — but it was real. She was concerned, but didn’t explode. She asked questions. She listened. She let the moment breathe. Why That Reaction Matters Technically, what Alma described can be considered sexual assault , given her level of intoxication. Bu...

Adolescence: A Mirror We Can’t Look Away From

  How Can a 13-Year-Old Commit Murder? What was once an absurd, unthinkable question is the central premise of Adolescence , Netflix ’s latest British drama.  From the first episode, the show grips you with its raw portrayal of youth violence. It pushes us to confront an unsettling reality—children, barely teenagers, are capable of unimaginable acts. But Adolescence does not sensationalize crime; rather, it dissects it , laying bare the complex web of factors that lead to such a moment. It’s Not About the Victim Unlike many crime dramas, Adolescence does not dwell on the victim. Instead, it forces us to ask: Who is the perpetrator? Who is his family? Who are his friends? What kind of environment produces a child capable of killing?  The show wrestles with these haunting questions, exposing the uncomfortable truth that the killer does not come from an easily identifiable “dangerous” background. His family is normal—too normal. This leads us to the most disturbing though...