Skip to main content

28 Years Later: Growing Up in the Apocalypse

 

28 years later

Some movies are easy to criticize because something clearly doesn't work. 28 Years Later is more difficult.

It isn't a bad movie. In fact, it starts incredibly well, has some fascinating ideas, and creates a world that immediately makes you curious. And yet, when the credits rolled, I couldn't shake the feeling that something was missing.

A Great Start

The movie wastes no time.

Its opening is shocking and immediately creates the feeling that you are watching something dangerous. 

The movie understands something important about horror: sometimes the best way to create fear is to make safety feel temporary.

For Spike (Alfie Williams), safety exists on the island. It is protected, isolated, and predictable. But eventually, he has to leave it.

That's more than a survival decision - it's growing up.

You Can't Protect a Child Forever

One of the most interesting conflicts in the movie is between Spike's parents and their different ideas of what it means to protect a child.

His father (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) understands the world they live in. He doesn't completely shield Spike from danger because doing so would ultimately make him less capable of surviving.

His mother (Jodie Comer) wants something different. She wants to preserve Spike's childhood for as long as possible.

Neither perspective is completely unreasonable. In a normal world, protecting a child from the horrors of adulthood is part of being a good parent. But this isn't a normal world.

Here, keeping a child innocent can actually become dangerous.

When Curiosity Becomes Dangerous

We are used to stories like this going horribly wrong.

A child makes a bad decision. Someone is sick. A dangerous place exists that everyone knows they shouldn't visit.

You immediately think: Well, this is going to end badly.

And Spike's decision to take his sick mother to the mainland feels exactly like the kind of decision that should set off a chain reaction of disasters.

Except... it doesn't quite.

The journey is dangerous, but the movie doesn't turn Spike's decision into the catastrophe I expected. Instead, the movie allows Spike's decision to become part of his development.

The Apocalypse Has Become Entertainment

Another small detail I really liked: the excitement people show when stories from outside arrive.

It says a lot about the society that has developed after 28 years of isolation. The outside world is terrifying, but it is also fascinating.

People want to hear about it. They want to know what is happening beyond their borders. Those stories bring people together and give them something to talk about.

They also provide something else: adrenaline.

When your everyday life is controlled by routine and survival, hearing about danger somewhere else can almost become entertainment.

Dr. Kelson: Crazy or Adaptable?

For me, Dr. Kelson is the most interesting character in the movie.

There is something fascinating about trying to decide whether he is crazy or simply incredibly well adapted to the world he lives in.

After 28 years, those two things may not be so easy to separate. He reminds me a lot of John Locke from Lost. The way he adapts and evolves is slightly unsettling and makes others think he is going crazy. 

We tend to judge people according to the rules of our own world. But what happens when the world changes completely?

Maybe the person who appears abnormal is actually the person who adapted best. He represents what happens when someone stops trying to survive by the old rules and fully accepts the new ones.

That's much more interesting to me than simply having another mysterious character in the story.

The Ending Feels Like a Beginning

By the end, I was left with the feeling that Spike's real journey hasn't actually started yet.

He has left the safety of his childhood behind. He has seen the mainland. He has experienced things that should change him.

What happens now? The movie doesn't give you a sense of closure; on the contrary. The end feels like things are only beginning.

Something Is Missing

This is why I'm having a hard time calling 28 Years Later a bad movie.

There is plenty here to like.

The opening is excellent. The world is intriguing. The infected are evolving in interesting ways. The conflict between protecting a child and preparing him for reality works. Dr. Kelson is fascinating. And there are even moments of humor, such as the Swedish soldier, that give the movie some welcome breathing room.

But all these pieces never completely come together for me.

There is a lot to explore. Perhaps too much. I wanted to know what happens to Spike. I wanted to understand the infected. I wanted to know more about this world and the people who have adapted to it.

But I also wanted this story to leave a stronger mark on me.

Maybe that's what 28 Years Later is ultimately missing: not ideas, but a stronger connection between them.

It is a movie about growing up in a world that no longer allows you to remain a child.

And perhaps, just like Spike, the movie itself is still growing into what it wants to become.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Handmaid’s Tale – From Brilliant to Frustrating

  When The Handmaid’s Tale first aired, it felt sharp, terrifying, and painfully necessary. I wrote about the first season as a dark and brilliant adaptation, one that used restraint, symbolism, and dread to tell its story. Now that I've finished the third season, my opinion has shifted — not wholly, but noticeably. The show is still good . Sometimes very good. But it also became frustrating, uneven, and less powerful than it could have been. June Osborne: From Survivor to Exhaustion Let’s talk about June (Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men ). I understand the idea behind her arc. She was meant to evolve — to become more confident, more assertive, more dangerous. A woman shaped by trauma who stops surviving and starts fighting back. On paper, it makes sense. On screen, however, it often doesn’t work. June becomes reckless to the point of irresponsibility. She repeatedly puts others in danger without seeming to fully care about who might be caught in the crossfire. Her actions feel impuls...
Post a Comment
Read more

Grief in the Shadows: Why 'The Silencing' Stands Out

  A moody thriller about grief, violence, and how far we go for the ones we love. Nikolaj Coster-Waldau ( Game of Thrones ) is Rayburn Swanson , a former hunter who now lives in isolation, running a wildlife sanctuary named after his missing daughter. Years after she vanished, Rayburn is just barely functioning—haunted, grieving, and clinging to the hope that she might still return. When a murdered girl turns up in the woods with eerie similarities to his daughter's disappearance, the local sheriff, Alice Gustafson ( Annabelle Wallis ), launches an investigation. Rayburn, meanwhile, accidentally crosses paths with a mysterious masked figure hunting a girl on his land. This encounter pulls him into the heart of the case in ways he never expected. The investigation twists, misleads, and slowly unravels, building toward a reveal that isn’t obvious—and intentionally so. Nothing is as straightforward as it seems. Themes of Grief and Family What makes The Silencing compelling is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gangsta Granny – Hilarious and Surprisingly Moving

  I have a ten-year-old daughter, and one thing we like to do is read the same books so we can talk about them afterward. Gangsta Granny was a birthday gift for her, and she read it so quickly that it immediately made me curious. When a child finishes a book that fast, you know something is working. When I finally read it myself, I was pleasantly surprised — and completely charmed. A Story That Is Funny and Moving At first glance, Gangsta Granny is a crazy, over-the-top, and very funny story. David Walliams clearly knows how to make children laugh, using absurd situations, exaggerated characters, and a fast-moving plot that keeps young readers hooked. But beneath the humour, the book is also sweet, touching, and emotionally rich. What starts as a wild adventure slowly reveals a story about family, loneliness, empathy, and learning to truly see the people around us. This balance reminded me of Roald Dahl’s books , where outrageous humour and emotional depth coexist effortles...
Post a Comment
Read more