Some movies are easy to criticize because something clearly doesn't work. 28 Years Later is more difficult.
It isn't a bad movie. In fact, it starts incredibly well, has some fascinating ideas, and creates a world that immediately makes you curious. And yet, when the credits rolled, I couldn't shake the feeling that something was missing.
A Great Start
The movie wastes no time.
Its opening is shocking and immediately creates the feeling that you are watching something dangerous.
The movie understands something important about horror: sometimes the best way to create fear is to make safety feel temporary.
For Spike (Alfie Williams), safety exists on the island. It is protected, isolated, and predictable. But eventually, he has to leave it.
That's more than a survival decision - it's growing up.
You Can't Protect a Child Forever
One of the most interesting conflicts in the movie is between Spike's parents and their different ideas of what it means to protect a child.
His father (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) understands the world they live in. He doesn't completely shield Spike from danger because doing so would ultimately make him less capable of surviving.
His mother (Jodie Comer) wants something different. She wants to preserve Spike's childhood for as long as possible.
Neither perspective is completely unreasonable. In a normal world, protecting a child from the horrors of adulthood is part of being a good parent. But this isn't a normal world.
Here, keeping a child innocent can actually become dangerous.
When Curiosity Becomes Dangerous
We are used to stories like this going horribly wrong.
A child makes a bad decision. Someone is sick. A dangerous place exists that everyone knows they shouldn't visit.
You immediately think: Well, this is going to end badly.
And Spike's decision to take his sick mother to the mainland feels exactly like the kind of decision that should set off a chain reaction of disasters.
Except... it doesn't quite.
The journey is dangerous, but the movie doesn't turn Spike's decision into the catastrophe I expected. Instead, the movie allows Spike's decision to become part of his development.
The Apocalypse Has Become Entertainment
Another small detail I really liked: the excitement people show when stories from outside arrive.
It says a lot about the society that has developed after 28 years of isolation. The outside world is terrifying, but it is also fascinating.
People want to hear about it. They want to know what is happening beyond their borders. Those stories bring people together and give them something to talk about.
They also provide something else: adrenaline.
When your everyday life is controlled by routine and survival, hearing about danger somewhere else can almost become entertainment.
Dr. Kelson: Crazy or Adaptable?
For me, Dr. Kelson is the most interesting character in the movie.
There is something fascinating about trying to decide whether he is crazy or simply incredibly well adapted to the world he lives in.
After 28 years, those two things may not be so easy to separate. He reminds me a lot of John Locke from Lost. The way he adapts and evolves is slightly unsettling and makes others think he is going crazy.
We tend to judge people according to the rules of our own world. But what happens when the world changes completely?
Maybe the person who appears abnormal is actually the person who adapted best. He represents what happens when someone stops trying to survive by the old rules and fully accepts the new ones.
That's much more interesting to me than simply having another mysterious character in the story.
The Ending Feels Like a Beginning
By the end, I was left with the feeling that Spike's real journey hasn't actually started yet.
He has left the safety of his childhood behind. He has seen the mainland. He has experienced things that should change him.
What happens now? The movie doesn't give you a sense of closure; on the contrary. The end feels like things are only beginning.
Something Is Missing
This is why I'm having a hard time calling 28 Years Later a bad movie.
There is plenty here to like.
The opening is excellent. The world is intriguing. The infected are evolving in interesting ways. The conflict between protecting a child and preparing him for reality works. Dr. Kelson is fascinating. And there are even moments of humor, such as the Swedish soldier, that give the movie some welcome breathing room.
But all these pieces never completely come together for me.
There is a lot to explore. Perhaps too much. I wanted to know what happens to Spike. I wanted to understand the infected. I wanted to know more about this world and the people who have adapted to it.
But I also wanted this story to leave a stronger mark on me.
Maybe that's what 28 Years Later is ultimately missing: not ideas, but a stronger connection between them.
It is a movie about growing up in a world that no longer allows you to remain a child.
And perhaps, just like Spike, the movie itself is still growing into what it wants to become.
Comments
Post a Comment