Skip to main content

Collision Course: What If Everything Had Happened Differently?

 

Collision Course

At first glance, Collision Course (Colisión) looks like another heist thriller. There's a bank robbery, inside information, a carefully planned operation, and a group of people who seem to know exactly what they're doing. 

It even has a bit of a Money Heist vibe. But don't get too comfortable with that impression, because it quickly turns into something quite different.

One Crime, Multiple Possibilities

The first big surprise comes when the film presents a second version of events. Wait, what? That's not what I signed up for! It takes a moment to understand what's happening, but once the concept becomes clear, the film starts playing an interesting game with its audience.

Following an accident during the getaway, the story explores different scenarios depending on who dies. Each possibility changes the course of the investigation, reveals new secrets, and exposes different sides of the characters. A small change in circumstances can have surprisingly big consequences, and suddenly we're questioning everything we've just watched.

This approach echoes Run Lola Run and Sliding Doors. Rather than simply telling us what happened, the film keeps asking what could have happened instead. What if someone else had died? Would the police have reached the same conclusions? Would the group have escaped, or would betrayal have found its way into every possible version of events?

Different Circumstances, Same People?

What makes this structure more interesting is that the alternative timelines aren't just a narrative trick. They show how quickly trust falls apart under pressure. Secrets, personal interests, and conflicting loyalties become increasingly difficult to hide, and the same people can behave very differently depending on the circumstances.

It also raises an interesting question: are the characters simply victims of unfortunate events, or were things always destined to go wrong because of the people involved?

It's an intriguing way to approach a crime thriller, even if not every scenario feels equally compelling.

An Interesting Experiment

I'll admit that this isn't necessarily my favorite kind of movie. The constant changes in perspective can be confusing at first, and the structure takes some getting used to. Still, once you understand what the film is trying to do, it works well enough.

Collision Course may start with the promise of a conventional bank robbery, but its real interest lies in exploring how different decisions can reshape the same chain of events. It's an unusual narrative experiment that doesn't completely win me over, but does enough to make the experience worthwhile.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gangsta Granny – Hilarious and Surprisingly Moving

  I have a ten-year-old daughter, and one thing we like to do is read the same books so we can talk about them afterward. Gangsta Granny was a birthday gift for her, and she read it so quickly that it immediately made me curious. When a child finishes a book that fast, you know something is working. When I finally read it myself, I was pleasantly surprised — and completely charmed. A Story That Is Funny and Moving At first glance, Gangsta Granny is a crazy, over-the-top, and very funny story. David Walliams clearly knows how to make children laugh, using absurd situations, exaggerated characters, and a fast-moving plot that keeps young readers hooked. But beneath the humour, the book is also sweet, touching, and emotionally rich. What starts as a wild adventure slowly reveals a story about family, loneliness, empathy, and learning to truly see the people around us. This balance reminded me of Roald Dahl’s books , where outrageous humour and emotional depth coexist effortles...

The Handmaid’s Tale – From Brilliant to Frustrating

  When The Handmaid’s Tale first aired, it felt sharp, terrifying, and painfully necessary. I wrote about the first season as a dark and brilliant adaptation, one that used restraint, symbolism, and dread to tell its story. Now that I've finished the third season, my opinion has shifted — not wholly, but noticeably. The show is still good . Sometimes very good. But it also became frustrating, uneven, and less powerful than it could have been. June Osborne: From Survivor to Exhaustion Let’s talk about June (Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men ). I understand the idea behind her arc. She was meant to evolve — to become more confident, more assertive, more dangerous. A woman shaped by trauma who stops surviving and starts fighting back. On paper, it makes sense. On screen, however, it often doesn’t work. June becomes reckless to the point of irresponsibility. She repeatedly puts others in danger without seeming to fully care about who might be caught in the crossfire. Her actions feel impuls...

Breaking Bad: When Desperation Redefines Morality

  Breaking Bad is often praised as one of the greatest television series ever made—and I definitely agree. Beneath its gripping plot and intense character arcs lies a deeply unsettling exploration of morality, identity, and the human capacity for self-justification. At its core, the show asks a haunting question: what happens when an ordinary person is pushed past their limits—and keeps going? Walter White: From Victim to Architect of Chaos Walter White (Bryan Cranston) begins as a man we instinctively sympathize with—a struggling high school chemistry teacher facing a terminal illness. His initial decision to cook methamphetamine is framed as an act of desperation, even sacrifice. He wants to provide for his family after his death. But that justification doesn’t hold for long. As the series progresses, Walter’s transformation becomes less about survival and more about control, pride, and power. The tragedy is not just that he becomes a criminal, but that he chooses to contin...